News articles and posts about astronomy and astronomy education
Even astronomers can't seem to settle on whether or not Pluto is a planet. And the press, of course, has to fan the flames of controversy wherever they may tread.
SPACE.com -- Pluto: Down But Maybe Not Out
It's been announced recently that the new moon ship will be called Orion.
How likely is it that this initiative will survive the next election?
Many scientists think manned spaceflight doesn't serve good scientific purposes. I believe a strong manned spaceflight program increases interest in space so much that the unmanned program benefits more than it would otherwise. Unlike many anti-manned spaceflight proponents, I don't think it has to be a zero-sum game.
Lockheed Martin Wins NASA Moon Contract
The Swift spacecraft gives astronomers a chance to see a supernova occur as it happens, rather than days or weeks after the explosion begins. Exciting stuff!
BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Supernova captured in 'real time'
Interesting point. I think all scale models of the solar system should keep Pluto and add in Ceres, Pallas, UB313, and some others as well.
Pluto in Maine's solar system
Free stuff for teachers, via the NSTA newsletter.
Free Resources for Science Teachers
Looks like the voting might go towards eliminating Pluto as a planet and calling it a dwarf.
Positing new planets divides astronomers
I've always been a little skeptical of the whole dark-matter thing...more of a physicist's point of view, I guess. It's not real until you put it on the table and let me manipulate it. This discovery has started nudging me over to the dark-matter camp.
Science & Technology at Scientific American.com: Colliding Clusters Shed Light on Dark Matter
More technical background on the planet definition thing from the IAU's web site.
IAU Website: NEWS
MORE on the continuing controversy about the new definition of planet.
You might be interested in why Pluto's moon "Charon" is included. It's because the Pluto-Charon system is considered a double planet. Both objects orbit a point between them, rather than having the balancing poing within the larger planet (as it is with the Earth and moon or Jupiter and its moons.)
Rocky Mountain News: Local
The IAU Draft Definition Of Planets And Plutons: "'A planet is a celestial body that (a) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (b) is in orbit around a star, and is neither a star nor a satellite of a planet.' Member of the Planet Definition Committee, Richard Binzel says: 'Our goal was to find a scientific basis for a new definition of planet and we chose gravity as the determining factor. Nature decides whether or not an object is a planet.'"
I for one am kind of glad it's a little bit vague--the definition of a planet makes an excellent discussion in class.
Astronomers Struggle to Define 'Planet'